Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill Udo Erasmus : EBOOK

Udo Erasmus

My favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘Sunshine and Flax Oil’ and goes like this: ‘The oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. Funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

This author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘Our body is made for activity. If there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ Well hell. I never thought of it like that. Creepy (oily) shit.

Tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. Not many books make me wish I knew more about chemistry, but this one did. It took me months to get through because I was trying hard to absorb it. In the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. Instead, I was left with an overall feeling that Udo Erasmus really knows his oils, and I now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. I don’t know my EPA from my DHA from my AA. But I’m slowly getting the picture.

First published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but I’d like to know if Udo Erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. In particular, I’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because Chris Masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. Erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and I can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. He must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. Proof of fishiness: ‘Cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ Then there’s an entire section titled ‘Is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ Since Erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. Statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. I seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so I’m keeping my eye on it.

This book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the West (or perhaps caused it), but I’ve heard from other equally learned people that the EFAs in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. I can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what Erasmus is recommending. He's really got a thing about flax. My father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. I remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. That stuff does not taste peachy. Just so you know. (Erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

I couldn’t understand Erasmus’ fascination to the Budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s Bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). That’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

I’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that Erasmus keeps busting out with. The breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of Wheat Belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. Not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. Erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘The need for EFAs may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. I’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (He’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) For people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

While this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘Many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. They literally kill themselves for others.’ If I had cancer, I don’t think I’d like to hear that I was ‘killing myself’. (After that there gem I skipped the chapter on AIDS.)

After reading this book I have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. First, I’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). I’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. I wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which I'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. I can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. But Erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. I wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. Maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

I’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (Dr Oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) Erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so I’ll finish the bottle I’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. Instead I’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which Erasmus isn’t a HUGE fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

I’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and I’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. I’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. Ticks ALL the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! This is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

Also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle I had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where I found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. If they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. But don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

All this oil business is so darned confusing that I don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. The good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

I recently started taking Evening Primrose Oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. This is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in Evening Primrose seed contain EFAs for all sorts of processes in the body – female AND male. However, Erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that I’m taking, and now I’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking EPO supplementation. Again, I'll finish the bottle, but next time I'll seek out an unrefined brand. I've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined EPO at about the same price I paid for mine at the local chemists'.

I’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in Australia) kangaroo meat more often, because I can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. Even eating organic beef -- which I know has been grass fed and finished – is against Erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. By eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (Which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

Like the Primal Body, Primal Mind book I recently finished, by Nora Gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. I thought that after reading this hefty volume I’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but I was wrong. I’m only motivated to learn more. Next I want to read that book on fats Dr Mary Enig. I also want to hear more about what Sally Fallon (of the Weston Price foundation) has to say. Mainly because I know they are big proponents of butter, and I do like tbutter… I suppose if I keep reading I’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

Overall, I’m probably more confused on the basics than I was before reading this book. For example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
Why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

I would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of Chris Kresser, Dr. Lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.

456

Organizations can restrict the fats that heal, fats that kill use of airdrop for devices or apps being managed by using an mdm solution. In both situations, you must provide css for the positioning and width of your affixed content. fats that heal, fats that kill For the polymerase chain reaction, the template is annealed to one or more short fats that heal, fats that kill primers typically bp at low stringency. Dave matthews is feeling a feeling that is fats that heal, fats that kill not a very good feeling. We are going to meet for drinks, nibbles and a fats that heal, fats that kill special discussion about how to restart our fun women's skillshares Fascists despise udo erasmus democracy and so like calling such a country "democratic" they say that the u. Please don't hesitate to register your team anyway if you wish to come, especially if your country isn't udo erasmus represented there already. But those early albums did have some decent songs on them, just waiting for better performances, especially "the jack" and "problem child", which are way better fats that heal, fats that kill here than their studio versions.

Your fats that heal, fats that kill inquiry related to our product and price will be answered within 12 hours. Filed under: homeschool, kids activities, science tagged with: activities for fats that heal, fats that kill kids, kids, kids activities, science, science experiment, simple science activities. Ringworm of the body is related to athlete's foot tinea pedis, jock fats that heal, fats that kill itch tinea cruris and ringworm of the scalp tinea capitis. A winery that makes an unaged rye as well as southern moon, an unaged corn liquor. fats that heal, fats that kill udo erasmus this form of logarithms is considered today as common logarithms. For udo erasmus some reason i get 6 smart points as the value, but well worth the effort. An element that must move toward the end of the list can move quickly because it can take part in successive fats that heal, fats that kill swaps. The plus side is that udo erasmus they can be used to lift and carry other large items, too.

Format: pdf, epub, fb2, txt,audiobook
Download ebook:
Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill.pdf
Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill.txt
Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill.epub
Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill.fb2
Download audiobook:
Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill.mp3

Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill book

Both discrete Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill steps and continuous ramps of pressure can be treated equally well.

Those who still adhere to the concept of innocent until proven guilty will get it right Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill away.

Small enough to access snug coves but large enough Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill for open-water sailing, Flora is the ideal size for making new friends without feeling too close.

On the second round, cast after the performances, Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill one voter could only vote on one member.

She also has a pet bat, Kou, Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill who can change into a variety of weapons that she uses for fighting.

Fee payment has to be made online only and all the necessary qualifying certificates and documents have to Fats That Heal, Fats That Kill be uploaded online at the time of submitting the application.

Combination treatment with atr and wee1 inhibitors and tumor control. my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
The 26 one-hour episodes examined the socio-economicpoliticaland cultural movements that my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
shaped the 20th century. Spain started the story inventing the main characters and their characteristics, then greece continued an my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
so on. Optimal platform to support real-time applications such as voice and video by providing features like internet group 456 management protocol igmp snooping multiple queues 4 with appropriate scheduling techniques prioritization of traffic based on port. Mox sibi mantellum brettamque reponit, abitque, 41 teofilo folengo ut factum dicat berto, matrique guadagnum, sed puer impatiens quidam non sanguine basso, seu ponte arlotti cretus seu ponte macerae, cui pars soldorum maior perduta dolebat, surgit et accipiens compagnos quinque vel octo post baldum afrettat, cui giurat tollere borsam, tollere si borsam nequeat vult tollere cappam, 456 at si nec cappam sagramentat velle bravettus rumpere cervellum, saxisque tridare misellum. Hedgehogs are lactose intolerant hedgehogs are actually my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
lactose intolerant, so milk should never be left out for them, water is perfectly fine. After you finish installation, set scsi as the first boot device to boot up the system. 456 Once set up you get basic controls to turn your device on and off, adjust the volume and change the channel. On 23 september, menzel announced my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
that she and lohr were engaged. All the above only my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
open you up to random ads as you will have no preference for facebook to go off. Solid my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
granite slabs make very heavy and durable countertops and improve home values. The ar assistant referee moves their flag in the direction of whose ball it is.

And the vibes didn't go unnoticed by the heat shield on the muffler, which self-destructed its front mounting. my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
The taper on the master is really good my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
and you can dial in any shade of volume easily. They will only do this if the borax is mixed with 456 a food source. The median age of someone who was unaffiliated during that decade was also seven my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
years younger than it is today: 29 vs. We spoke to her to get her thoughts on a crucial hand she played on day 3 that put her in great position to 456 make the final table. Marshablackburn : my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
"women's suffrage was a year process. While digital formats are my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
widely accepted because they are easily distributed to stakeholders, some organizations might want printed bids. The army emphasizes my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
that you are a soldier first, a doctor second, and your specialty third. On the mainland, mac cinnfhaelaidh owns a magic cow who gives such abundant milk 456 that everyone, including balor, wants to possess her. The exhaust my favourite line in the whole book concerns ‘sunshine and flax oil’ and goes like this: ‘the oil is so smooth that you may inadvertently ‘oil your underwear’ when you think you’re just going to pass a little gas’. funny because it’s strangely specific, and would have to be based on personal experience, would it not?

this author offers all sorts of lifestyle tips, including advice to exercise, the reason given thusly: ‘our body is made for activity. if there were nothing to do, we wouldn’t need a body – we could just be disembodied spirits floating about.’ well hell. i never thought of it like that. creepy (oily) shit.

tidbits like these make this otherwise chemistry-heavy tome an unexpectedly enjoyable read. not many books make me wish i knew more about chemistry, but this one did. it took me months to get through because i was trying hard to absorb it. in the end, unless you’re scientifically literate, you probably won’t absorb much of it. instead, i was left with an overall feeling that udo erasmus really knows his oils, and i now have a clearer idea about which oils to buy and how to cook with them (which was the point of reading this book in the first place) but don’t ask me to regurgitate why. i don’t know my epa from my dha from my aa. but i’m slowly getting the picture.

first published in 1986, this isn’t exactly an ancient book, but i’d like to know if udo erasmus has revised any of his ideas on nutrition since then. in particular, i’d love to know what he makes of the latest research on high cholesterol, because chris masterjohn and others are slowly proving that there’s more to that than meets the eye. erasmus knew something was fishy even when he was writing this book, and i can’t work out whether he’s bothered by cholesterol or not. he must have a proper sore arse from sitting on that fence. proof of fishiness: ‘cholesterol cannot be the primary cause of cardiovascular disease,’ he writes, ‘because our cholesterol has remained about the same in the last 100 years.’ then there’s an entire section titled ‘is the cholesterol theory wrong?’ since erasmus published this book there has been a disturbing campaign to get us all on statins. statins have horrible side-effects, especially for women, so this research needs doing urgently. i seem to be one of the 30 percent whose blood lipids are affected by dietary fat, so i’m keeping my eye on it.

this book was written at the height of the popularity of flax oil in the west (or perhaps caused it), but i’ve heard from other equally learned people that the efas in flax oil are inferior to that in fish oil since flax oil is not handled particularly well by the body. i can’t remember whether that applies equally to ground up flax seeds though, which is what erasmus is recommending. he's really got a thing about flax. my father bought a bottle of flax stuff about 20 years ago. i remember it because it sat in the fridge for months. that stuff does not taste peachy. just so you know. (erasmus didn't mention that bit.)

i couldn’t understand erasmus’ fascination to the budwig woman (and in an interesting typo she’s bugwig on page 320 – a name as nutty as the person, perhaps). that’s not to say that nutters don’t sometimes have good points, and in the end, it seemed like she had few of them.

i’m less and less convinced of the healthfulness of whole grains, that erasmus keeps busting out with. the breeding of wheat significantly changed the modern wheat plant in the mid-eighties (see reviews of wheat belly), and this book preceded the epidemic of gluten intolerances and sensitivity. not everyone does well on ‘healthy whole grains’ these days. erasmus points out that no one diet fits all, and even notes that ‘the need for efas may vary by a factor of 10 or more between individuals’. i’d also like him to acknowledge that this may also be true for other foods, not just fats, by banging on less about grains. (he’s right about whole wheat products, though, which are not whole wheat at all – just white flour with a bit of the fibre added back in.) for people wishing to follow the advice to eat whole grains, it would pay to look into the difference between real whole grains and the highly processed, fake kind.

while this book is worth reading for the chemistry, some of it sounds far too new-agey for my tastes. ‘many people with cancer have poor self-esteem, and put out more effort than they have energy for, to prove to others that they are worthy. they literally kill themselves for others.’ if i had cancer, i don’t think i’d like to hear that i was ‘killing myself’. (after that there gem i skipped the chapter on aids.)

after reading this book i have made a few changes in my day-to-day life. first, i’m cooking at a lower temperature and am not browning my sausages (much). i’m further encouraged to make heavy use of the slow cooker, and even bought a second one since one is on half the time making bone broth for soups. i wanted to know whether to invest in a deep-fryer, which i'd like to use for making sweet potato chips in coconut oil. i can't get them crispy enough in the oven without burning the ones at the back. but erasmus is no fan of deep-fried food. i wonder what he'd think of foods deep fried in coconut oil, though. maybe back in the 80s no one was doing that?

i’d been wondering about the health benefits of rice bran oil, which is one of the trendy oils at present. (dr oz is in passionate love with the stuff.) erasmus doesn’t mind it, but says it’s of no particular benefit either, so i’ll finish the bottle i’ve got but won’t bother to replace it. instead i’ve become a bit of a fan of coconut oil, which erasmus isn’t a huge fan of, but he does point out that it was unfairly vilified.

i’m now far more suspicious of oils in general, and i’m trying to buy them in smaller quantities, and only in dark bottles. i’ve noticed at the supermarket that even though some manufacturers of olive oils say that their olive oil is cold-pressed, extra virgin, organic (i.e. ticks all the boxes) that they sell it in a clear bottle! this is ludicrous, and doesn’t convince me that they know what they’re doing at all, or that they might be bull-shitting about the 'cold-pressed' bit.

also ridiculous: to find the olive oil in the right kind of bottle i had to avoid the oils section altogether and check out the ‘gourmet’ section of the supermarket, where i found a bottle of good olive oil, in a dark bottle, on the bottom shelf marked half price because it’s to be ‘discontinued’. if they shelved it in a more sensible place it might sell better. but don't get me started on supermarket ridiculousness.

all this oil business is so darned confusing that i don’t blame people for just picking the cheapest oil on the shelf. the good stuff isn’t selling at anywhere near the quantities it should be.

i recently started taking evening primrose oil supplements, which state in large letters on the front of their (pink) tub that they are for alleviating women’s premenstrual symptoms. this is annoying, and part of the whole gendered marketing game, because the oils in evening primrose seed contain efas for all sorts of processes in the body – female and male. however, erasmus points out that unless stated otherwise, it’ll be the refined, deodorised kind that i’m taking, and now i’m wondering if there’s any point at all in taking epo supplementation. again, i'll finish the bottle, but next time i'll seek out an unrefined brand. i've already looked up the price online and was pleasantly surprised to find a vendor which sells non refined epo at about the same price i paid for mine at the local chemists'.

i’ve decided to buy buffalo and (since we live in australia) kangaroo meat more often, because i can be sure those animals have avoided feed lots. even eating organic beef -- which i know has been grass fed and finished – is against erasmus’ ideal diet since modern farm animals have been bred for their ability to store fat. by eating truly wild animals we’re eating fat in proportion to the way we evolved, without having to trim any of it off. (which is a total waste considering how expensive these meats are.)

like the primal body, primal mind book i recently finished, by nora gedgaudas, this book on the surprisingly political issue of oils and fats can lead to a kind of food paranoia. i thought that after reading this hefty volume i’d know everything a layperson could possibly hope to know in regards to cooking and grocery shopping, but i was wrong. i’m only motivated to learn more. next i want to read that book on fats dr mary enig. i also want to hear more about what sally fallon (of the weston price foundation) has to say. mainly because i know they are big proponents of butter, and i do like tbutter… i suppose if i keep reading i’ll find evidence to support *all* of my food choices!

overall, i’m probably more confused on the basics than i was before reading this book. for example, why advocate the use of juices (over and over again) while at the same time advocating limitation of sugar?
why advocate a vegetarian diet for lowering cholesterol when you include a chapter on how theories of cholesterol and heart disease are probably wrong anyway?

i would still recommend this book, but only in conjunction with more up-to-date (renegade) science, preferably from the likes of chris kresser, dr. lo and other doctors in the paleo/naturopath community who seem to be making good progress in understanding the real effect of fats on human health.
system should be designed to provide minimum duct air velocities of.

Back To Home